Victoria Azarenka vs Anett Kontaveit Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W L L
Form
W L W L L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Azarenka 2 - 1 Kontaveit
They have played 7 sets in total, with Azarenka winning 5 and Kontaveit winning 2. The last match between Azarenka and Kontaveit was at the Grampians Trophy - Melbourne, 06-02-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Anett Kontaveit getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | 2 |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 |
Grampians Trophy - Melbourne(06-02-2021)
| Azarenka | Stats | Kontaveit |
|---|---|---|
| 36% (4-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 48 | Ranking | 81 |
| 1 | Highest Rank | 2 |
| 35 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 22 | Titles | 17 |
| 71% (642-267) | Career Total W/L | 66% (404-209) |
| $30,817,522 | Career Prize Money | $5,888,999 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
| 5-7 7-5 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Victoria Azarenka
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Anett Kontaveit
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 36 | Games Won | 20 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 0:43:15 | Average Match Time | 0:43:15 |
| 60% (87/146) | 1st Serve % | 63% (79/126) |
| 74% (64/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (50/79) |
| 39% (23/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (19/47) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 45% (57/126) | Return Points Win % | 40% (59/146) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Victoria Azarenka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Victoria Azarenka
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Victoria Azarenka
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
36%
(
8 of
22)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
31
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Victoria Azarenka
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Clervie Ngounoue
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Victoria Azarenka
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
4
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Victoria Azarenka
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Victoria Azarenka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Victoria Azarenka
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
6
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
7
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Anett Kontaveit Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Anett Kontaveit
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Anett Kontaveit
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Anett Kontaveit
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Alycia Parks
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
11
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Anett Kontaveit
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Anett Kontaveit
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Shuai Zhang
63%
(
76 of
120)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Anett Kontaveit
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71% (642/267) | Win/Loss | 66% (404/209) |
| 68% (1382/648) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (880/525) |
| 58% (10590/7711) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7110/5799) |
| 72% (391/151) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (163/103) |
| 68% (141/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (97/51) |
| 69% (51/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 74% (96/34) |
| 69% (59/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 70% (48/21) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1761 | Aces Total | 1367 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 3206 | Total Double Faults | 1454 |
| 1:5:9 | Average Match Time | 1:1:52 |
| 350.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.22 |
| 66% (35395/53449) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18354/29705) |
| 66% (23217/35395) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (12165/18354) |
| 45% (8035/18054) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5257/11350) |
| 49% (3743/7576) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1641/3509) |
| 48% (26730/55437) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12933/29272) |
| 73% (169/63) | Slam W/L | 57% (47/35) |
| 70% (243/103) | Masters W/L | 56% (62/49) |
| 74% (14/5) | Cups W/L | 68% (15/7) |
| 69% (188/86) | Main Tour W/L | 66% (136/71) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 74% (28/10) | Challenger W/L | 71% (98/40) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 87% (46/7) |
| 72% (631/873) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (398/603) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 56% (102/182) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (76/135) |
| 58% (140/243) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (108/183) |
| 91% (631/574) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (386/346) |
| 8% (631/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (386/39) |
| 26% (276/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (227/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
